
Of what you ask? Well of being the main character in a storybook ending to the Hokies 2011-2012 season. In fact, the entire Hokie Nation was robbed on Tuesday Night when in the final moments of the 2012 Allstate Sugar Bowl, PAC1012 officials reversed a call that was originally ruled a Touchdown on the field.
Instead we get Michigan putting another notch in their chewed and raw bedpost.
There have been countless articles written on “the Coale Touchdown that Wasn’t” by now and if you explore college football message boards and the comment sections of articles about the game people continue to argue back and forth if it was actually a catch. Fans of other teams have flooded the conversation by refrencing a similar moment in their program’s history that will haunt them forever. Well, that National Championship trophy case in Merryman Athletic Center is still empty, but we apparently can now sit at the big boy’s table along side teams that have been royally screwed at a pivotal moment in an important game by a blown call. But what is beyond the argument of “whether it was a catch or not” isn’t really what should be at the center of the discussion because its the fact that there is SUCH a discussion that shows just how wrong the officials got the call.
Somewhere in the creation of instant replay we seemed to forget that the replay system was never intended to be the replacement for on-field calls. The system was given a purpose and a limited power to allow an official to reverse a ruling if and only if the video evidence convinces him beyond all doubt that the ruling was incorrect. Without such indisputable video evidence, the replay official must allow the ruling to stand. (See NCAA’s Rule Book if you don’t believe it). As someone who works pretty much every day in a legal field that requires the daunting level of proof of “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt” the fact that this call was reversed FAR exceeds the absurdity of verdicts from famous cases like OJ Simpson or Casey Anthony. For the original on-field call to be overturned it means that there basically had to be no-doubt-about-it, 0% I’m wrong, I’d bet my life on it kind of confidence in the video evidence. Well, we have all the video evidence and the controversy rages on - just proving just how much doubt there truly was.

Now, had the on-field call been initially incomplete I believe I would have actually accepted the outcome of the call and ultimately the game. I would have been angry for a bit, I would have still believed that Coale was deprived of a reward he so deserved after all he gave the Hokies this season (and four seasons prior). Understand that if the call was originally “incomplete” then the rule, per NCAA, would have forced the replay official to let the call stand because it was simply not possible to definitively know from the video if the instincts and eyes of that on-field official was right or wrong.
But why? Why was it that the official got not just the play but the RULE so wrong? Some conspiracy theorists speculate that it was because the Sugar Bowl Executive behind the game, who was grinning ear to ear and said he was “happy” Michigan was the victor, is in fact himself a Michigan graduate and “encouraged” the outcome one way or another. Looking back over the game its hard to argue against the bias calls that were made against the Hokies. Sure the Personal Foul Roughing the Kicker that swung back the momentum in the first half could have been called by any officiating crew… but when you juxtapose that with a pass interference call on an interception which was clearly a mutual battle for a ball (if not offensive interference) and that the crew whistled David Wilson down when his knee was 5 inches off the ground in a key running play that could have broken open for massive yardage - well then the final call really does raise some eyebrows. Add the fact that the first video review of the play was complete and the official ran back to the field ready to uphold the touchdown call but was then called back to have the (super rare) SECOND video review for further analysis of “possession.” And then add the cherry on top: knowledge that the Michigan-rooting Sugar Bowl Executive was sitting in the same room as the replay official and you have yourself a full-on tin foil hat wearing paranoia onset.
Enter then all the demons that come flying back based upon this bizarre ending to the Sugar Bowl - Tech’s inability to sell more tickets to the game, the ACC’s poor showing against other conferences, VT’s record in BCS bowls, Wilson’s decision to leave school for NFL draft, Beamer’s bowl results and its impact on boosters. ALL of those story lines come back now with that one single bad call (and albeit some other mistakes by the team in the game).
Don’t get me wrong, Michigan does not deserve to LOSE its Sugar Bowl trophy - THEY didn’t do anything (although neither did their offense by scoring a grand total of 184 yards) - but the way in which they won left no one inside of the Superdome truly content. We wanted the storybook ending and we we were robbed along with Danny Coale. That catch, if allowed to stand would be the rolling highlight of Tech montages for years to come, it would be played a 100k times on YouTube in a matter of days, it would be the sugar sweet ending that Virginia Tech fans never, ever, seem to enjoy. And so the familiar Hokie’s drum beat continues… 11-3… no BCS trophy, no hero on the shoulders of the team, no silencing the critics.
With the advent of HD televisions, Tivo, automatic call reviewing by officials (without the need for a challenge flag), and even over-confident broadcaster analysis it seems like now the goal of the instant replay and review is to find any possible way to show something DIDN’T happen - as in this case that WR Danny Coale didn’t have possession of a football that knocked the wind of out him when he smashed it to his chest. With that blatant mistake by the officials we turned a great story in to the children’s book that was printed by Buddy the Elf’s mean father - it just ends - and we walk off the field.